To: Moseley; onyx; Jane Long; miss marmelstein; 20yearsofinternet; tirednvirginia; PJBankard; ...
You, sir, are a LIAR. You KNOW you are a liar. You are a damnable liar.
In case you missed it earlier, let me semi-spell this out for you, ask Vanna to buy a letter if you still don't get it:
Go f--k yourself.
Q - How can you tell when a lawyer is lying?
A - Does anyone REALLY need the answer to that?
Lawyers are experts in prevarication, lies and deception. Which is probably why you are so hell bent on helping out your fellow lawyer, Lyin' Ted.
Just because you have not seen a document does not mean that Ted Cruz sealed anything.
SHAME, SIR, SHAME.
Now that your drama queen sputterings have been properly responded to, let's proceed:
Jonathan, (mind if I call you Jonathan? That IS your first name isn't it?)
How is it that you have been snoozing away for damn near 4 months before suddenly arising from the FR graveyard to rear your ugly head on this thread TODAY?
Your posting history is spotty at best and as I previously mentioned, you haven't had much to say about anything since last year.
How's that crowdfunding effort to prove Saint Teddy is eligible to run for President going?
Oh yeah, you raised $50 out of your $3000 goal.
Maybe chase some ambulances for some extra cash to donate to the cause?
Happy to help.
468 posted on
04/11/2016 5:52:14 AM PDT by
mkjessup
(CruzBot MADNESS!! It's like Reefer Madness without the fumes! But it still stinks!)
To: mkjessup
“How is it that you have been snoozing away for damn near 4 months before suddenly arising from the FR graveyard to rear your ugly head on this thread TODAY”
Because I noticed that you are lying about a hearing today.
And I am thoroughly disgusted that after the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has already put a fork in this topic,
you are
STILL
lying about it.
I can understand lying about this in 2015.
I can maybe understand lying about this in January 2016.
But you are STILL lying about it — even after the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has already rejected your arguments, on the substance (not standing).
You have no shame.
471 posted on
04/11/2016 5:55:57 AM PDT by
Moseley
(http://www.MoseleyComments.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson