Not all represent candidates, but can even be only “anti-candidate,” which is its own strange beast.
‘Not all represent candidates, but can even be only anti-candidate, which is its own strange beast.’
Why would a PAC be “anti-candidate”? Honest PACs should be “pro-candidate”. Is there an anti-Cruz PAC? Anti-Kasich?
The only reason for the existence of an “anti-candidate” PAC is that their nemesis threatens their livelihood or the their very existence.
Think GOPe; think cheap labor express.