Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why did Ted Cruz's PAC give half a million to Carly Fiorina's?
CBS NEWS ^ | 01 OCTOBER 2015 | CHRISTINA RUFFINI

Posted on 03/27/2016 9:47:35 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) has asked a Ted Cruz super PAC to explain why it gave $500,000 to another super PAC supporting one of his Republican rivals.

According to financial disclosures from June, Keep the Promise I - one of four separate committees backing Cruz - gave half a million dollars to CARLY for America, the political action committee supporting Carly Fiorina.

Super PACs are legally allowed to give money to other super PACs - they are only prohibited from donating directly to any political campaign. But it's unusual for one of these groups to give money to an opponent, especially when the candidate it supports is still in the race.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California; US: New York; US: Texas; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 2016election; 2016gopprimary; 500000dollars; adulterated; california; caracarletonfiorina; caracarletonsneed; carley; carlyfiorina; cbs; christinaruffini; cruz; donors; election2016; fec; fiorina; followthemoney; garyhart; icarly; johnedwards; johnkasich; money; nationalenquirer; newyork; ohio; sarahisgurflores; schlonged; ted; tedcruz; tedscruz; texas; trump; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-208 next last
To: austinaero

Your “shorthand” became a lie.

Live with it.


121 posted on 03/27/2016 11:18:52 AM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

For subscription fees on Ashley Madison?


122 posted on 03/27/2016 11:18:54 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (GOP delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

“...if it’s legal, why is the FEC asking instead of minding its own business?”

Firstly, because it’s highly unusual for one PAC to give money to a rival PAC, and secondly, because it is their business to pay close attention to such activities.


123 posted on 03/27/2016 11:20:32 AM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: austinaero

Those who gave to that PAC SHOULD ask why their money went to a competitor.

Cruz isn’t a contributor and isn’t allowed to talk with or to the PAC.

Get some education.


124 posted on 03/27/2016 11:21:04 AM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Dang, you’re a tough grader.


125 posted on 03/27/2016 11:21:20 AM PDT by Pelham (A refusal to deport is defacto amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Hattie

“The candidates do not have PAC’s.”

That is correct, but the PACs have candidates. They are owned.


126 posted on 03/27/2016 11:21:23 AM PDT by map
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
It was tongue in cheek

He was mocking you, young rube.

FReegards!

 photo million-vet-march.jpg

127 posted on 03/27/2016 11:22:30 AM PDT by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Amanda Carpenter, one of the alleged women, has now DELETED ALL of her tweets prior to March 1 of this year.

A couple days ago, she had tweets on her Twitter page going back to at least 2014, and I personally saw the tattoo tweets on April 1, 2014.


128 posted on 03/27/2016 11:22:34 AM PDT by BagCamAddict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl
Cruz was most likely planning to have Carly as his VP choice. Why is the media making a big deal out of something completely legal?

In June 2015 Cruz polled about 5% and Fiorina 2%; just read what you wrote and see if you believe it. $500,000 line item with no explanation; very unusual.

Back in June ? Seriously ? Not Gov Martinez ? Not Gov Haley ? Not Sen Ayotte ? I thought Cruz was supposed to be Tea Party ...

129 posted on 03/27/2016 11:22:48 AM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dstorm

Ed Gross is a bigot?

Elaborate and give links

Your post made me look

Never heard of him till your post


130 posted on 03/27/2016 11:24:02 AM PDT by wardaddy (Cruz path to nomination is a box canyon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: datura

Not guilty!

If the allegations prove true, I sure won’t criticize his taste in pretty girls.


131 posted on 03/27/2016 11:24:13 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (GOP delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber
Cruz wants Fiorina as his Veep nominee, for the reasons already discussed. Trump fans are so out of it they believed this was a “secret” transfer, even though it was in the major news outlets SIX MONTHS AGO. Hilarious!

OK, so here's the question: WHY didn't Cruz just say so? Why is there no official explanation for the payment? I haven't seen any? Have you?

Why let this fester? Just issue a statement detailing the reason, and move on.

132 posted on 03/27/2016 11:24:29 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
This transfer was in June 2015. Are you saying that Cruz had decided to make her his VEEP all the way back then?

It is a totally lame explanation ... but what other explanation could there be for Cruz?

If he decided to make her the VP, then he should have publicly declared that ... he did not.

133 posted on 03/27/2016 11:24:48 AM PDT by dartuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: map

Not all represent candidates, but can even be only “anti-candidate,” which is its own strange beast.


134 posted on 03/27/2016 11:25:26 AM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Hattie

The candidates do not have PAC’s.
*********************************
Exactly. The FEC is wrong for asking Cruz; they should be asking the folks that run thoses two Super PACs. It’s really none of their business though, since such transfers of funds between Super PACs is perfectly legal and is not connected to a candidate’s campaign.


135 posted on 03/27/2016 11:26:43 AM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Please, Cruz can’t communicate a thing to or from a Super PAC. Even if wanted Carly as VP, he can’t even imply for someone to give money to her.


136 posted on 03/27/2016 11:27:00 AM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
For one thing, it’s well known that they can’t stand each other.

Why the endorsement then?

137 posted on 03/27/2016 11:27:22 AM PDT by dartuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I did not say Cruz bears responsibility.

I asked why Cruz is not asking why his PAC money was given to Florina.

It is not against the law to question in public why his PAC Money
was given to Florina.

The fact he is not asking, tells me he knew in advance this money was
going to be given to Florina.

Your comment does not make sense.
If it were your PAC money, I am certain you would like to know why.


138 posted on 03/27/2016 11:29:24 AM PDT by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

Cruz had nothing to do with it. If the Super PAC people thought they would do that on their own, that is considered legal.

There was no reason for Cruz to have done that and it was/is illegal to even whisper to anyone with a Super PAC to do anything.


139 posted on 03/27/2016 11:30:04 AM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
Please, Cruz can’t communicate a thing to or from a Super PAC.

Bless your pea-pickin, naive little heart.

If you believe there has been NO COMMUNICATION between Cruz & his PACs, I've got a bridge in Brooklyn and a Florida swamp in NJ to sell you.

140 posted on 03/27/2016 11:30:38 AM PDT by newfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-208 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson