Posted on 03/24/2016 7:26:21 AM PDT by mbrfl
Cruz team sent out emails to Utah supporters on the day of the caucus, telling people they can vote absentee that day - in violation of state law.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
187 funded by George Soros to stop Trump....now does that sound like Soros is supporting Trump, no, I didn’t think so...
Soros is funding Kasich which helps Trump.
And who pray tell is funding CRUZ?
Check this out. .....Particularly the Lou Dobb part
More on where Mrs CRUZ stands
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gXcYCwaBKnQ
LMFAO. Where did you find that?
Your smarter than that!!! (unless your a kindergarten drop out)
From the Utah GOP rules site:
“The ability to print the online ballot will only be available to a registered
Republican from that specific precinct. The ballot will not include the individual’s
name, but will include their unique Voter ID, number or another suitable unique
identifier at the top of the ballot. Individuals are only allowed to vote using their
unique ballot. No copies of ballots are allowed.”
What part of that don’t you understand? You are contradicting what is on the authoritative site.
There isn’t any provision for absentee ballots, except votes done via email because the person was serving in the military or in a mission outside Utah, and that person has to make provisions 72 hours ahead of the caucus. But that’s clearly not what Cruz was talking about. Perhaps Still and his source were confused by the Cruz team’s use of the word “absentee”, but though online voters would ALL be called “absentee votes” in a standard election, they were expected to be the norm in this election. Voting remotely from the precinct was a PLANNED part of this election - and one of the ways to do it was the way that Cruz’s team talked about. It’s all right there in the website I linked to and copied from. Did you even read it?
I can’t remember. I had it saved to my hard drive.
Did you notice that ALL the money peeps behind Cruz are FOR amnesty? How do you wiggle out of that fact? Just curious
Doesn’t mean Cruz is.
Donald Trump is for touchback amnesty and according to Trump he’s funding himself so touchback amnesty it is.
Not to mention all the democrats in congress that support amnesty Trump has helped to get elected can ensure Trump gets his touchback amnesty.
Yep, that makes tons of sense. Campaign on strengthening the borders and booting the undocumented ones out. But hey, he’ll just have a gate or two installed so they all come back.
C’mon, you guys are not that dense, I hope!
With Bush and Ryan and Club for Growth along with the other powerhouses, you cannot tell us that Cruz isn’t in line with their amnesty agenda. I hope you are intelligent enough to connect the dots here, it’s not that hard.
In 2012 Trump considered Romney’s position of self deportation too tough.
Trump has been very clear about touchback amnesty.
The operative word here is “campaigning”.
If Hillary Clinton changed every past position she ever had while she was “campaigning” I wouldn’t believe her, so why would I believe the guy that supported the Clintons for over 20 years that has changed every position he’s ever had while he’s “campaigning”.
Less than a year ago Trump supported the terrorist position that attacked Pam Geller.
Has Trump changed his position on the attack for his “campaign” or does he still support the terrorist position?
Now who’s dense.
So 4 years ago he saw the situation one way, and now sees it another. And yet Ted can do the same and it’s ok?
WHO has the backing of ALL the amnesty pushers?
This is not a trick question and I have no interest in a back and forth. I am trying to understand how Cruz will be a champion for amnesty if those who get him to where he’s trying to go, are FOR it.
It’s not about Trump or anyone else. I’m asking about Cruz.
Cruz isn’t for amnesty.
So did Bush, Romney, Graham, McCain, Club for Growth, et al change their open borders position? Or is Cruz going to somehow buck ALL of them, and more, and close the border?
How does that work? I haven’t been given an answer to this as I doubt I will.
Cruz’s position on amnesty has been explained here by various people over 100 times.
My explaining it to you once more won’t make a difference.
When someone is feigning ignorance that’s their choice, nobody can change them.
We saw the same tactic with Obamacare.
As Gruber said with Obamacare, the supporters weren’t too ignorant to know that it was all a lie, they knew it was a lie and were too stupid to care so they repeated the lie.
So Cruz is not able to fight amnesty, true or false?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.