bttt
Had the SCOTUS not slapped down the lower court, the case could then be made that no forms of electronic communications would be covered under the 1st Amendment.
Mark
The short-term end result is meaningless because the Masshole politicians will now classify stun-guns as hand guns, subject to the same rules, regulations, requirements, and permit discretion in this “may-carry” state, which means that the average law abiding citizens will not be able to carry a stun gun to protect themselves.
The Baker appointments to the court will be very interesting.