Posted on 02/10/2016 7:28:12 AM PST by Zakeet
The MSM newsers not very good at pretending they are impartial these days, and the NY Daily Snooze has abandoned the cause completely with respect to Donald Trump.
Today's front page, shown above, sets the tone for their lead article titled Donald Trump wins 2016 GOP New Hampshire primary; 'We are going to make America great again'. The hack job starts out this way:
Clueless New Hampshire voters handed billionaire bore Donald Trump a "yuge" victory in the first-in-the nation primary Tuesday, providing the mad mogul with a new round of ammo a week after a disappointing second-place finish in Iowa.More than three in 10 Granite State voters flocked to the foul-mouthed contender, throwing their support to him at levels beyond what the polls had predicted - a day after he referred to a Republican challenger Ted Cruz as a "pussy."
[Snip]
At a victory rally, Trump thanked the state's "special" brainless voters who jumpstarted his momentum in the race.
Undoubtedly the Daily News' unbiased coverage will continue to improve as the campaign progresses.
LOL!
Trump seems to have everybody in a fit these days.
“Many polls show trump beating Dems better than Cruz.”
Which ones?
From: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/2016_presidential_race.html
Trump Vs. Clinton:
RCP Average - Clinton +4.0
Quinnipiac - Clinton +5
NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl - Clinton +10
FOX News - Trump +3
Cruz Vs. Clinton:
RCP Average - Cruz +1.0
Quinnipiac - Tie
NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl - Clinton +4
FOX News - Cruz +7
Trump Vs. Sanders:
RCP Average - Sanders +7.7
Quinnipiac - Sanders +10
NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl - Sanders +15
PPP - Trump +2
Cruz Vs. Sanders:
RCP Average - Sanders +1.5
Quinnipiac - Sanders +4
PPP - Cruz +1
As you can see, in just about every single poll they track, Cruz performs better than Trump against either Clinton or Trump.
“And the negatives - is that all voters, if not exactly who is it?”
Yes, all voters.
Oops, that should have been: “Cruz performs better than Trump against either Clinton or Sanders”.
You mean Gordon Tullock, and Richard Epstein?
:-)
If Trump’s negatives are so high why did he do so good in Iowa and blow out NH??
Yes. LOL. Those guys. Did I say MacKenzie? I think he was there too.
It’s called projection. If they really wanted to see brain dead they should look into the mirror. Their followers collect handouts until election time and then DO AS THEY ARE TOLD!
“If Trump’s negatives are so high why did he do so good in Iowa and blow out NH??”
Well, because this is a primary, not the general election, and because there are still enough candidates in the race that someone can get a “blow out” even if the majority of their own party’s voters dislike them, just as long as that majority doesn’t coalesce behind a single candidate.
Ok - now it’s not about Trump’s “high negatives”??
I'm no fan of Trump or many of his supporters on this forum ...
This clown stuff is ridiculous. Where's the NYDN on Benghazi, and classified material on her private server, and the rest of Hillary's high crimes and misdemeanors all the way back to the Rose Law Firm? Where's the NYDN on Sanders' unconcealed communism?
Let's have some substance, instead of mindless name-calling.
Thanks. NYDN is demonstrating the “New York Values” that Cruz so rightly rejected.
Huh?
You asked me why he could still perform well in a primary despite high negatives and I explained it to you. I guess this stuff is just beyond your grasp...
Maybe Trump or one of his friend should take the newspaper (and I use that term loosely) in a hostile action — and fire all staff.
Beyond my grasp?? LOL!!
I don’t know how else to explain your seeming inability to understand a simple issue like this.
Cue the ad hominem fallacy, cute.
Thanks for that one - kinda proves the point that so many seem to want to overlook - Cruz won’t be saved from the mud slinging. It’s written in their DNA to despise anything other than die hard libs/commies.
I am actually laughing at the unraveling of the haters, I can relate since 7 long years of barry has made me feel the same at times.
What do you want from me? You want to be able to play dumb and pretend you can’t understand grammar school level concepts, but then object if I imply you’re dumb?
You can’t have it both ways. If you are really so dumb you can’t understand it, then fine, I won’t hold it against you. However, if that is the case you can hardly fault me for speculating as to the cause of your confusion.
More ad hominem. Cute.
You know, this sort of s*** just firms up my support for Trump.
Insulting readers is no way to win them over.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.