Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 4Zoltan
Here are the reports from the Illinois heaaring officer.

http://www.elections.state.il.us/Downloads/AboutTheBoard/PDF/02_01_16SOEBAgenda.pdf

Whenever I have a question regarding a constitutional issue, I always consult an Illinois hearing officer.

We could have saved a lot of time on the "Gay Marriage" issue had we simply consulted an Illinois hearing officer first.

341 posted on 02/02/2016 8:15:37 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
-- We could have saved a lot of time on the "Gay Marriage" issue had we simply consulted an Illinois hearing officer first. --

The Illinois hearing officer did not produce a reasoned decision, just summarily asserted that no naturalization process manes not naturalized. Cruz's memorandum of law did not address the arguments presented in the complaint.

358 posted on 02/02/2016 8:46:55 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp

You best get use to it. Cruz’s motion to dismiss is almost identical to his motion to dismiss in Florida (Voeltz v Florida SoS). Different lawyers but almost word for word the same. My guess is it will be a winning argument wherever he needs to present it.


359 posted on 02/02/2016 8:49:23 PM PST by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson