First link: Absolutely nothing new or determinative. A waste of time.
Second link:Absolutely nothing new or determanitive.
Third link: I’ve seen this “timeline” many times already. The only problem with it is that it lacks key dates. It is inexcusably missing Ted Cruz’s birth date, for example: it is December 22, 1970, but you would not learn this from the “timeline”. Also missing: any dates or information on when either Rafael Cruz or Eleanor Cruz became Canadian citizens. Without this key information the “timeline” is worthless.
Fourth link: A complete crock, worthless inflammatory and reckless speculation.
Fifth link: Completely irrelevant and non-determinative rambling and speculation as well as dragging in the worthless and incomplete “timeline”.
I was really hoping you had something. It is disappointing that all you have is the same third-hand, incomplete, irrelevant, trivial and worthless crap that everyone else is so recklessly tossing around. Nothing but junk.
The Conservative Treehouse ought to be ashamed for peddling this trash. I used to respect them but they have gone into the tank for Trump.
I’m glad you took the time to read all of that stuff. It was hard to compile the best out there because of all the “irrelevant” rabbit holes out there. I agree it was missing the pertinent dates and so much had repetitive information that may or may not be reliable. The best stuff may have been scrubbed. Sorry you found it a waste but I tried to give an indication of what’s out there.
The situation with Obama’s natural born citizen controversy has elements similar to “Ted” Cruz’s. In both cases, the mother’s citizenship gave automatic citizenship. However, in both cases, the status of “natural born citizen” have not been tested. People ask, why test “Ted” Cruz’s status of natural born citizen when Obama got a free ride and he had a strong case for illegibility. As far as I can see, we should drop it. However, the other side will not give a free ride to Mr. Cruz like they did for their guy, Obama. They may make quite a fight over the issue because they feel the other side tried to use the issue to defame their guy. They want revenge. That revenge may be an expensive fight if “Ted” does not beat them at the pass and get a judicial judgement in his favor.