So you still refuse to address my actual argument and you revel in your own ignorance.
Duly noted.
More #Strawmen.
YOU have already made it clear that this is an issue you brought up and which I have not delved into.
Again, I am not making any assertions with regard to your #Strawman argument.
Those are the facts.
Keep in mind that your incessant use of personal attacks aptly shows your lack of an intellectual argument.
If you want, I can report your abuse.
Prove me wrong. Show me how our right to keep and bear arms is a civil right and not a natural right. Simply give me some evidence, not just your say so, that proves your view to be the correct one.
You brought this about with your original misrepresentation!
I'm challenging your assertion. It is now incumbent upon you to prove your assertion and disprove mine.
Your assertion is that the right to keep and bear arms is a civil right. My contention is that you're ignorant (uninformed) about the issue, that the right to keep and bear arms is a natural right and you have misrepresented the issue.
Can you grasp that?