Global warming is a hoax.
Prosecute me.
So Hussein is supposed to make up a law under which to prosecute?
He would never do that...would he?
So if you disagree with ANY state “fact” you can be prosecuted....
Yup we are done as a country with any real freedom...
RICO???? who are these loonified “scientists”..cousins of al gore?
THE SPANISH INQUISITION!!!
Start with me A$$hole!
Is it April First already?
Where is that meme of “Global Climate Change Denier”?
There were at least a couple that were funny.
Trump handled that question perfectly. He said "It's so cute that you believe."
A real scientist wouldn’t ask that. Science is all about debate, putting different ideas out there and debating them in a scientific context.
http://patriotpost.us/opinion/37721
1.) Human progress: The amount of people, life expectancy and global personal GDP. These hockey sticks show that, since the advent of fossil fuels, the human condition has improved immensely.
2.) The factual record of CO2 and temperature in the geological history of the earth.
Conclusion:
There is no apparent linkage, so why is CO2 suddenly the climate control knob when there were years with higher CO2 and lower temperatures?
Isn’t that supposed to be global climate change since global warming didn’t pan out?
Perhaps this should be used on those who have knowingly deceived the American people about the risks of climate change in order to receive government funding
This is what happens when people see that their grant money might be going away.
It’s pretty scary when so-called “scientists” are arguing for using the law to persecute those who disagree with their “consensus”. I guess they probably also thing the Catholic church was completely justified in persecuting Galileo, since he broken with the “consensus” and threatened the church’s monopoly on the truth.
Just exactly like in the old days when truth-seeking scientists of their day, such as Galileo, Louis Pasteur, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, Alfred Wegener, Antoine Lavoisier, and Robin Warren and Barry J., refused to “compromise” with the 99% of their peers who were flagrantly wrong, and were threatened with everything from burning at the stake to professional annihilation. Nothing seems to have changed other than that the reactionary forces are now labeled as “Progresive”.
Truth seeking isn’t about compromising, it’s about sifting through the available knowledge and applying reasoning to discard the obvious BS and figuring out what is most likely from the rest.
If you want to know who these scientists are, click on this link:
http://www.iges.org/letter/LetterPresidentAG.pdf
It looks to me like a certain department at George Mason University has a number of professors with waaay too much time on their hands.
Jagadish Shukla, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
Edward Maibach, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
Paul Dirmeyer, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
Barry Klinger, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
Paul Schopf, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
David Straus, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
Edward Sarachik, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Michael Wallace, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Alan Robock, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
Eugenia Kalnay, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
William Lau, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Kevin Trenberth, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO
T.N. Krishnamurti, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
Vasu Misra, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
Ben Kirtman, University of Miami, Miami, FL
Robert Dickinson, University of Texas, Austin, TX
Michela Biasutti, Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY
Mark Cane, Columbia University, New York, NY
Lisa Goddard, Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY
Alan Betts, Atmospheric Research, Pittsford, VT
Prosecute me first. AGW is a hoax.
- Galileo