Norm and I have had that same conversation a few times.
‘ceptin’ he gets mad as a wet hen when I disrespect his San Diego triple fence.
Ain’t never seen him concede that boots on the ground might be an easier solution in some places.
It’s progress. I’ll take it.
Sniper towers placed at intervals are more economical and effective than mass deployment
My entire reason for being against the boots on the ground approach is simple.
Several times now, boots have been put on the ground in an act of theater. Evwey time boots will be put on the ground will be an act of theater. Those were made for more than walkin and watching. But thats all Democrats and gutless republicants will ever...EVER let them do. We have history to prove it repeatedly and believing that will change as long as a dem holds any position to stop or interfere with them is just not comporting with the facts ‘on the ground.’
It’s not, nor has it ever been a case og the theory being flawed. There is no question in my mind that unfettered troops/BP/ICE COULD and WOULD work sans fence. But it WON’T as long as Dems have any say whatsoever.
As for the SD fence, it does work. The only numbers showing it does not come from LaRaza and other hate America types. It MASSIVELY reduced illegals and diverted them where?
To the open unfenced desert where anyone can go as a tourist attraction and watch them cross with BP watching them, ordered to stand down by Democrats more often than not, depending on whats in the news cycle.