JohnBoy, you just need to be more like Mitch. He does what I say without crying about it.
JohnBoy, you just need to be more like Mitch. He does what I say without crying about it.
Yes. Roberts is writing legislation from the bench, which is not allowed by the Constitution. However, the die was cast when the SCOTUS found the right to murder babies in the Consttution, which is criminal. Once they found the right to murder the most innocent among us, anything goes. Next, it could be the extermination of the expensive elderly that SCOTUSCARE will require in order to stay afloat. Roberts will vote for that as well.
Any impeachments should start with this drunken Maoist.
It is too late for that. The damage has already been done.
Seriously - conservatives and Congress can’t even get e-mail copies from low-level functionaries at IRS or State - and they intend to impeach the Chief Justice. What a joke.
Do you have any other nice-sounding fantasies?
Ain't gonna happen, we're stuck with him like Earl Warren.
Today,it's "it depends on what the meaning of "state" is".
Yes. But, the ruling class would never allow it.
Yes, absolutely. And I would love to hear a presidential candidate endorse that action.
Don’t miss the source of this story: The Nation.
Useless. 1st off, the P-T-B wanted this ruling. DC is a kabuki theater with the outcome of any question already decided; just how it is presented to the public shifts with “political necessity”.
America would be far better off if the 9-11 terrorists had landed on a SOTU joint session of congress than the WTC towers.
America, as it was founded, is finished.
If we cannot impeach Obama for his indisputable treasonous acts he consistently flaunts in the open, how do we impeach a sitting justice over an opinion?
This country is toast.
Today,it's "it depends on what the meaning of "state" is".
With Boehner the fix is in. Roberts, like Traitorobama, could rape a boy on the steps of the Supreme Court, then kill him afterwards, and the GOP-controlled House would not impeach.
The Republicans are at fault for doing nothing to stop this. It is they that have allowed these actions to grow exponentially.
When you give a little, people always will come back to take more.
I was the new kid at school, 8th grade. One of the hoods demanded 'lunch money'. I ended up getting my ass kicked, but not w/o doing some damage. No one bothered me again.
The Republicans gave their lunch money to the democrats a long time ago.
Yes.
Congress repeatedly stated in writing that it is not a tax but a penalty. Roberts ignored that and called it a tax.
Congress made clear that subsidies were an inducement to States to establish an exchange. Roberts ignored that, too.
He’s making things up out of whole cloth.
Keen political instincts you’ve got there, Bill.
Oh wait... you’re just a career liar. Nevermind.
Not while Obama is making the appointments.
Impeach Roberrts? Yes! Oh wait, and then let Obama put in a even more radical Judge! FUBAR!!!
It is grossly unfair to point a finger at only Roberts. Sure, he was the last line of defense, but many, many traitors played a part in it long before it got to him.
And the list is far too long to outline here. But you know who they are.