1 posted on
06/09/2015 7:20:25 AM PDT by
pabianice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: pabianice
Behold the Constitutional Law Professor lecturing on the Supreme Court:
34 posted on
06/09/2015 8:13:02 AM PDT by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: pabianice
What a whinging sissy Obungler is.
To: pabianice
To: pabianice
This should be an easy case; frankly it shouldn't have even been taken up, Obama said... It is an easy case. The plain language of the statute is clear, the legislative intent and history is clear, the IRS regulations , prior to being "set straight" by the political apparatchiks in the treasury were clear, and we have video of the principal architect of the law explaining why subsidies were only going to be given to residents of states which have their own insurance exchanges. Nothing could be clearer, it ought to be a slam dunk.
The astonishing thing is there will be members of the Supreme Court who will find a way to get around the unimpeachable evidence before them.
I have difficulty deciding if this guy is evil, knowing he is lying or stupid, believing he is telling the truth.
39 posted on
06/09/2015 8:50:55 AM PDT by
Timocrat
(Ingnorantia non excusat)
To: pabianice
This should be an easy case; frankly it shouldn't have even been taken up, Obama said
Wow. No ego or delusion of grandeur there......
41 posted on
06/09/2015 9:09:48 AM PDT by
48th SPS Crusader
(I am an American. Not a Republican or a Democrat)
To: pabianice
To: pabianice
I say, “Physician, heal thyself.”
Ostensibly, he’s a constitutional law professor. He skip the class on separation of powers, 10th amendment, etc?
To: pabianice
This should be an easy case; frankly it shouldn't have even been taken up, Agreed. The Enumerated Powers do not mention meddling in our purchasing decisions by mandating that we buy a product we don't want. Obamacare is unconstitutional and never should have been proposed, passed, or signed. If either Congress or the White House had done their job, there would have been no case to take up.
46 posted on
06/09/2015 10:22:02 AM PDT by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: pabianice
Its hugely frustrating for the president, said Julian Zelizer, professor of public affairs at Princeton University. Oh, yes. Much better to make him God-Emperor Bararckula, and give him unlimited, unquestioned, unanswerable power over all things great and small.
48 posted on
06/09/2015 10:33:26 AM PDT by
NorthMountain
("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
To: pabianice
Why does the whiner-in-chief care about the SCOTUS ruling? Worst case, he knows he can easily bully the GOP-e Congress into passing a fix. They’ve been working on a draft bill for weeks already. I believe Sen. Ron Johnson — erstwhile Tea Party darling from WI — is the author.
49 posted on
06/09/2015 10:45:07 AM PDT by
kevao
(Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
To: pabianice
“In some of his toughest and bluntest comments to date, Obama said the Supreme Court should not even have accepted a case challenging his signature healthcare law.”
Wow, overtly clear that the Fuhrer is now telling the 3rd branch they are irrelevant. He already did that with Congress by signing EOs.
50 posted on
06/09/2015 2:42:01 PM PDT by
Hardens Hollow
(Couldn't find Galt's Gulch, so created our own Harden's Hollow to quit paying the fascist beast.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson