Skip to comments.
Judge orders Clinton Foundation racketeering case to trial
Washington Examiner ^
| 5-29-2015
| Sarah Westwood
Posted on 05/29/2015 7:31:33 PM PDT by smoothsailing
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-110 last
To: onyx
101
posted on
05/31/2015 4:58:30 AM PDT
by
Tucker39
(Welcome to America! Now speak English; and keep to the right....In driving, in Faith, and politics.)
To: trisham
You’re giving scum sucking swine a bad name.
Just sayin’.
102
posted on
05/31/2015 5:00:54 AM PDT
by
Tucker39
(Welcome to America! Now speak English; and keep to the right....In driving, in Faith, and politics.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Nothing more than more legal maneuvering, then the judge will dismiss the case for cause. Then the Clinton's will claim that the issue was reviewed and all their actions found perfectly legal.
Waste of resources to go after somebody in the privileged class, beyond providing an opportunity to mislead the public about the integrity of the justice process.
103
posted on
05/31/2015 5:10:00 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: MaxMax
--
Are felons eligible for POTUS? --
Yes, absolutely.
104
posted on
05/31/2015 5:10:57 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: smoothsailing
--
Why set a trial date? --
To keep up the appearance that the law applies to everybody.
105
posted on
05/31/2015 5:15:18 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: T Ruth
Your posts were very informative, thank you.
I hope Judge Middlebrooks will not be influenced by being a Clinton appointee, but will be guided only by the facts and the law.
To: smoothsailing
Even with such a protocol, can a judge decline to schedule by refusing to accept or hear the case? So long as the Constitutional and statutory standards for jurisdiction are met, the District Court cannot refuse the case.
Doesnt the Supreme Court do that?
The Supreme Court's mandatory jurisdiction is very limited. Most of the Supreme Court's jurisdiction is discretionary. So it can refuse a discretionary case if it wants to.
107
posted on
05/31/2015 10:41:53 AM PDT
by
T Ruth
(Mohammedanism shall be defeated.)
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Why not criminal charges?
108
posted on
05/31/2015 10:59:23 AM PDT
by
The_Media_never_lie
(The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
To: T Ruth
Thanks again, your replies have been most helpful! :)
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Hope the judge has really good protection.
He could wind up having an “accident”
110
posted on
05/31/2015 4:18:56 PM PDT
by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-110 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson