To: kevkrom
I’m old enough to remember when he was a quack. Now his nutritional ideas are conventional wisdom. But he rarely gets credit.
26 posted on
05/28/2015 10:33:04 AM PDT by
St_Thomas_Aquinas
( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
I think there was that “fad” point in the early 2000’s, too, where people who needed to lose maybe 20 pounds were doing “low-carb”. It’s really not a good plan for that - it’s better for those who are significantly overweight and need to retrain themselves how to eat healthy food.
For some reason, it also seems to work better for men than women, which makes sense since the sexes have different biologies, but I’ve yet to see any good research into what specific biological differences come into play on that score.
27 posted on
05/28/2015 10:36:38 AM PDT by
kevkrom
(I'm not an unreasonable man... well, actually, I am. But hear me out anyway.)
To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
Im old enough to remember when he was a quack. Now his nutritional ideas are conventional wisdom. But he rarely gets credit.
Same here and have watched the slow evolution of the ADA towards Adkins. Those that claim Adkins is a high protein low carb diet are clueless and spouting misinformation.
I am amazed his findings came from experience in a clinical practice. In other words he had to have results.
The role of triglycerides, HDL levels and insulin resistance have been recklessly ignored by our dietary gurus.
38 posted on
05/28/2015 12:57:56 PM PDT by
PA Engineer
(Liberate America from the Occupation Media.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson