Pollsters hear what they want to hear. There are very few “neutral” and truly unbiased polls now circulating. Many of them have already become “push polls”, asked in such a way that the predetermined outcome is all but assured.
Based on logic alone, there is no way that the “acceptance” of the gay agenda in any way benefits society as a whole. The primary purpose is to demolish as much of the existing social contract as is possible, then build a new “consensus” around all the new-found nuances on “equality” and “social justice”.
This whole “extended conversation” thing reminds me of tricks canvassers for charities do to try and get you to commit (I mean say “Yes”) so they can send you a pledge bill in the mail. They often record that word where they can to prove you pledged something.
BTW, if you do not pay that bill when you get the ‘pledge’ follow-up, those suckers will send it to collection.
My standard line to ANYBODY for ANY charity when I get a phone call at home is “I’m sorry, I don’t give money over the phone.” And, then I hang up regardless of what they’re trying to tell me.