Ah, Sonya, are you naive or evil?
This is about the right NOT to participate without having the State come down on your head.
I’m pretty sure you know that. I think back to a question you were asked pre-Obamacare, whether a law requiring purchasing broccoli would be Constitutional, and you, instead of answering the question and invalidating Obamacare, you avoided it by being intentionally obtuse.
“For Sotomayor, apparently anything short of judicially mandated sodomy is within the justices’ constitutional prerogatives – a view that would surprise any of our nation’s founding jurists, whether Jeffersonian or Hamiltonian.”
The progressive forces feel they can safely leave that sordid task to Justices appointed by future Presidents Clinton, Bush, Kennedy, etc...
He might as well consider the project failed. It was a noble effort.
The “Wise” Latina hath spoken!
Uhh... the issue is completely about force.
Some of us will be forced to photograph a gay “wedding”, which is a creative and expressive form of communication counter to our religious values.
Some of us will be forced to bake a custom artistic cake for a gay “wedding”, which is a creative and expressive form of communication counter to our religious values.
Some of us will be forced to print invitations for a gay “wedding”, which is a creative and expressive form of communication counter to our religious values.
Some of us will be forced to invite people onto our property and into our home, if we run a B&B, for a gay “wedding”, which is a government taking of our private property.
But despite all that, Chief Thug Sotomayor from BigGov.org says she is not taking away our liberty. It would be prudent for the Thug Party to take away our Second Amendment rights first, which is why the far left is frantic to disarm us before they take these reprehensible actions that they claim will not take away our liberty.
Sotomayor is just modifying the old pro-abortion canard: If you don’t like abortion, don’t have one.
As Joe Sobran said: Beware the man who offers you his position as a compromise between his position and your position.
Only God gives rights. And she is most definitely NOT Him.
The idea that men can arbitrarily give rights is fatal to all of the foundations of this free republic.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men..."
Crappy argument. Wrong, and weak to boot.
"gays" are not a class; they are a verb. HOMOSEXUALS are what we are talking about. Homosexuals cannot marry up to their own and reproduce; it is as simple as that. They recruit and manipulate but given their own devices (even on liberal terms of there is no GOD!!!) they simply cannot exist as a predominant anything. They can't reproduce. Homosexuality is a mental disorder; that is it. And WHEN things get ugly in this land (i.e., a collapse) their type will be extinguished with no government left to defend their depraved ways.
She just people choose their sexual orientation. Hmmm isn’t that against the narrative?