ok, so first, you need to take a chill pill before you blow a gasket.
second, you inferred from your earlier post he got banned for saying net neutrality was a good thing. now you’re saying ask jim.
so why did i want to know? its one thing, like you said, to promote an agenda like homosexuality, its quite another to have a different opinion. i wouldnt want to contribute to a website that would ban someone for that.
and since you’re so interested in my opinions, i’m come here because i generally agree with this sites philosophy, other than vaccines, which most people here seem to approve of, and animals, which i dont mind if peta protests animal cruelty at, say, a medical lab that uses animals in experiments, i would say i’m pretty right wing.
if that helps you at all.
So, you are posting on a thread about the takeover of the Internet by Obama’s lackeys at the FCC and your principal concern is that someone got banned for arguing about how great that was because it meant that hiss Netflix speed was going to improve.
I take it from your concern that you agree with the banned poster and disagree with the decision of the site to cancel his account.
Does that pretty much state your opinion?