7) Ban Foreign or Religious Law From American Courts (SB 199). The purpose of this law is to prevent Muslims from using Shariah law to co-opt our legal institutions...
Aren’t the Progressive leftists supposedly BIG advocates of the “Separation of church and State”.....
Well I guess a Mosque is not a Church or Temple....
Create the MEME...
Feed the MEME....
PIMP THE MEME!
Hunting with silencers doesn’t sound like a good idea. Growing up my friends and I were all over the place, field, stream, and woods. We were well acquainted with popular hunting spots because of gunfire and so avoided them.
I’m moving to Montana soon
Gonna be a dental floss tycoon.
God bless you Jim. Texas, and now Montana are on the top of my list of I ever have to move back to the ‘ol USA.
All I see are a bunch of reasons to move to Montana.
A lot of these sound like positive change to me.
Actually, it's extremely bizarre these days to see a legislative agenda that does not encourage homosexual marriage, pedophilia, transsexuals, drug use, and illegal immigration ... or praise Islam and slam Christianity ... or try to eliminate gun rights and gut the military ... or encourage race baiting!
Salon would think balancing your checkbook would be an extremist act.
I wonder what they would say about Wilson's 14 Points? >:(
Number 3 is a little weird. Do they really have an areolae flashing problem in Montana?
As far as I remember, TEA was one thing. Taxed, Enough, Already. It covered a wide variety of ages, races, religions and areas of the country.
The favorite game of the left now is to hang every social, religious, and political position they don’t like in one box, and call it “TEA”.
TEA started with that guy yelling “stop spending stop spending stop spending”.
They love making TEA about everything, because they HATE the idea of TEA being a one issue concept of reigning in government spending.
I’d rather not see obese people in shorts and tank tops jiggling around in the grocery store, but I can always look the other way.
I like to walk-hunt, not sit in a blind-I don’t want to be doing that where someone with a silencer is walk-hunting too-it seems dangerous. But there is nothing bizarre about any of that, in my opinion-I think most recent democrat proposals are bizarre because they reward negative/bad behavior...
Seems like a good start.
From the comments at salon;
“While today’s Democrats are clearly not the same as today’s republicans (who have gone so tribal and authoritarian as to no longer even be conservative-radical right is more accurate), today’s Democrats DO align closely with Republicans of about 30 years ago.
I share your fears, but here’s a serious question. How do we keep the country from moving ever rightward while the Dems move ever rightward?”
So the Tea Party has officially endorsed these laws?
Some of the dress code laws, I look at and think, "Don't they have something better to do with their time?". But I suppose if they're worrying about a Legislative Dress Code, then they're not picking the voters' pockets.
Well now, who wants someone to do any critical thinking? We can’t have that! How messed up would people be if they thought for themselves?
Be a good little sheeple and listen what the “Brian Williams”, Obamas and the Dimocrats say and follow them down the cliff.
Number five - “encourage critical thinking” - is interesting. Weren’t conservatives excoriated in some states a few years ago for OPPOSING such bills on the belief that they were intended to aggressively undermine parental religious beliefs?
6 and 8 should be promoted.
So is Salon located in Montana?
No?
Then they need to mind their own business.
That’s the beauty of a “republic”.