Posted on 11/20/2014 8:31:58 PM PST by cakid1
Calguns Foundation: Court denies requests by California Attorney General Kamala Harris.
(Excerpt) Read more at calgunsfoundation.org ...
In a new order released today, Federal District Court Judge Anthony W. Ishii rejected two requests made by California Attorney General Kamala Harris in the dispute, captioned Silvester, et al. v. Harris, that was filed in Fresno nearly three years ago.
Ah, just take the ruling to Obama, supreme lord and master of this country. He’ll know what to do.
Good news if so.
Would that include the “one handgun per month”?
If so, expect increasing gun sales in CA.
“Would that include the “one handgun per month”?
If so, expect increasing gun sales in CA.”
I don’t think so, but guns are flying off the shelves here at a rate in excess of 600,000 per year. Everything our Legislative a$$holes do gets them a lawsuit.
FWIW “Peruta” ( the 9th Circuit ruling that takes CA’s “may issue” CCW law down) hits a milestone on December 4th. If by that date one of the unassociated justices does NOT request and en banc review, then pretty much all of the appeals are done. The 9th has already told the Atty. General, Brady Bunch and a couple of Cop organizations that their bids to have the law en banc reviewed have been rejected. And if you think CA’s ruling elite is worried, you only need to look at Hawaii where their heads are about to come off over this case.
If the moron politicians hadn’t banned open carry it probably would have kept the impetus for a concealed showdown from gaining steam.
“If the moron politicians hadn’t banned open carry it probably would have kept the impetus for a concealed showdown from gaining steam.”
Well it was “very old moron politicians,” because the State banned open carry of hand guns in 1923. It was only in 2012 that they banned open carry of unloaded handguns, and banned the open carry in most places of long guns as well.
At least the A$$holes here in the GOPE have gotten a reprieve since three RAT State Senators have been banned from the Senate for being indicted for crimes. And we are on a run of minorities in that regard. One Black (bribery), One Mexican (not living in his district) and one Chinese (gun running). Thus far only the Black guy has been kicked out of office because his trial is finished, he was found guilty, and he is in the slammer. Hopefully more of them will get caught with their hands in the cookie jar, because it’s the only way to get them out of office.
I was VERY glad that Kamala Harris said “no” to being the nominee for Holder’s job.
“I was VERY glad that Kamala Harris said “no” to being the nominee for Holder’s job.”
Hsssh! We don’t want to make her think twice about being Herr Obozos new head Nazi AG.
She might make Holder look like a boy scout.
She might make Holder look like a boy scout.
**************************
On 2A she would!
Either Harris or Newsom will be our next governor. Screwed either way
“Either Harris or Newsom will be our next governor. Screwed either way.”
Either will make Moonbeam look like a nice moderate!
Antonio Villaraigosa has already stated his interest and with 1.5 million new Democrat voters in California as of last night he stands a good chance of winning.
I agree he may run and he’s dumb as a box of rocks. So he’s perfect.
so has the waiting period been abolished or do you still have to wait 10 days, or?
if not yet, when, what date will it be abolished? or do we know?
thanks!
I wonder how the Libs would like a 10-day “Cooling Off” period for ABORTIONS???
Sorry, but you are mistaken. Open carry of loaded handguns was banned in 1967, not 1923.
Here is an article about the 1923 law:
http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2014/11/california-concealed-carry-law-has.html
Your analogy would hold “water” if the kamakazi rocket planes had holed half of the carriers in the U.S fleet, and they were taking on water while the crews fought the fires.
If Peruta stands, and odds are that it will, we win.
How do you stop concealed carry reciprocity across the nation when you have as your redoubt six little east coast states, and the entire rest of the country has shall issue or constitutional carry?
I submit that the truth would be closer if your analogy reversed the roles. It is the Californian politicos that are fighting a desperate rearguard action. Heller was their Midway, and McDonald, MacArthur’s return to the Philippines. Concealed carry has been the Island hopping. Illinois was Okinawa. Peruta is a potential Hiroshima.
We just successfully “firebombed” Tokyo with the Palmer decision.
Fine, I stand corrected! Whether it’s 1923 or 1967, it’s still been the law for a long time. Just keep a good thought that none of the 9th Circuit judges decide to put Peruta v. San Diego through an en banc. The operative date is December 4, 2014. After that date if there are no internal challenges, Peruta becomes controlling and the only path Harris has is an appeal to the SCOTUS. BTW, if you haven’t taken the time to read Peruta, you should. These two judges who wrote it did an excellent job and it will be hard for the SCOTUS to ignore their writings.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.