Coelacanth is a "kind", and I doubt the fossils of yesteryear are substantially different from those of living coelacanths today.
I don't have time to track down the full forward for "The Genesis Flood" for you - have other responsibilities, but it's there.
GToE will be shown for the lie that it is in due time, and there's no rational basis for it to be the "default" position other than the old argumentum ad populum. I never was very popular in school, and am quite content to hold unpopular views as long as they jive with facts and common sense.
Exhausted...
Well, that's an assertion, of no more real value than if I replied, "No it's not." (Is this the argument clinic?) But more to the point, the existence of a prime mover would hardly negate the theory of evolution. Lots of people, including many in this forum, regard evolution as a wondrous tool wielded by the Creator.
Coelacanth is a "kind", and I doubt the fossils of yesteryear are substantially different from those of living coelacanths today.
Now you're using a term that has no scientific definition, and can therefore be defined and redefined as you need to depending on what you're discussing. But again, that's beside the point. The fact that some examples of the "kind" are still around doesn't mean other examples didn't die out 66 million years ago. Or do you think that the existence of cows means that aurochs are not extinct?
I will look for a copy of The Genesis Flood.
GToE will be shown for the lie that it is in due time, and there's no rational basis for it to be the "default" position other than the old argumentum ad populum.
Well, that and all that evidence stuff...