You two guys! Your replies were as I expected. Minutes after I posted I noticed the error in my assumption since every mention on this thread was in regards to Ichthyosaurs and not even one mention of Cartorhynchus lenticarpus.
But I still stand by all of my statements that followed and you two, true to form, defend evolution by ‘straining at a gnat while swallowing a camel’ - iow evolutionists will often attack what ever they can find wrong or even create a strawman argument before they will ever entertain the debate of the main idea or focal point of the post [hint: in this case it was the theory of information put forth by Shannon].
So please by all means carry on swatting at the gnats while failing to notice all of the logical holes in your silly evolutionary assumptions - why it’s only the mere chance of a blissful blessed life eternal in paradise which hangs in the balance for you.
JimSEA you once previously encourage me to enroll in some beginner courses for geology and biology. Now would you please consider returning to you English fundamentals and show me where the language of Genesis presents as an allegory?
Better yet show me any other written text that even begins to compete with the uniqueness of the Holy Bible [hint: you can’t]. Even when taken as a purely history text it’s accuracy is without equal and I assure you it is much much more than a mere history text.
You two may like the idea of being a monkey’s uncle but I’d rather accept God’s Word as true and all of the promises that accompany this belief. After all to paraphrase Pascal what have I got to lose?
Teach the controversy? I think that Genisis is allegorical because there is no factual basis to it. There is a great deal of factual evidence to the theory of evolution. There is indisputable evidence for the geological theories of gradualism, deep time and plate tectonics.