Replies

To: fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; GOPsterinMA; randita; Sun; LdSentinal; ExTexasRedhead; ...

I am hopeful for significant gains, but it’s very touch-and-go in a number of races. Many are not shaping as expected.

2 posted on 10/20/2014 3:03:03 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (The War on Drugs is Big Government statism)

To: Clintonfatigued

Depends on what one expected.

4 posted on 10/20/2014 3:07:36 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart ("Refusing to vote against unprincipled people made Obama President. " - agere_contra)

To: Clintonfatigued

Significant gains will send he message to th GOPe that they don’t need conservative votes. I prefer a squeaker if not an outright loss.

5 posted on 10/20/2014 3:08:16 PM PDT by Maceman

To: Clintonfatigued; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; randita; Perdogg; BillyBoy; InterceptPoint; ...

I hope to exceed the 242 from 2010, if not the 246 from 1946. It’s difficult to predict.

The rats have shut their mouths about the (never extant) possibly of them having a net gain, so that’s good.

Here’s a worrying poll from a GOP seat

Hendrix College

Patrick Henry (get it? he must be a “patriot” like Patrick Henry) Hays (D) 46%

French Hill (R) 42%

Hopefully Spanish Mound is able to pull it out.

24 posted on 10/20/2014 8:11:10 PM PDT by Impy (Voting democrat out of spite? Then you are America's enemy, like every other rat voter.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794