Isn't that how we vote on issues? We make judgments on whether we think pot should be legal, or one candidate or another should win? All I'm saying is that personally, I see no harm and would vote for it to be legal. I would not impose legality if the majority voted against it. I would not go to court over it. I just think its an issue that, in a democracy, can be decided on by a popular vote.
“All I’m saying is that personally, I see no harm”
My point exactly.
You set yourself up as the only authority.
What have you done to come to your expert conclusion?