Posted on 08/17/2014 9:40:36 PM PDT by Nachum
An autopsy conducted on Michael Brown, the unarmed 18-year-old fatally shot by Ferguson, Missouri, police officer Darren Wilson last Saturday, shows that Brown was shot at least six times, twice in the head and all in the front of the body. The New York Times reported the results of a private autopsy conducted by Dr. Michael Baden, who was hired by the Brown family. Baden conducted the autopsy on Sunday, according to the Times. One bullet entered the top of Browns skull. Four struck him in the right arm. All bullets hit Brown in the front of the body, according to
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
It will get lost, like a bunch or hard drives.
bump
But how can this possibly be?
Because all of those witnesses you hear talking in the background on the 10-minute cellphone recording who heard the shots from somewhere else and then came over too late to see any of the shots fired, all corroborate the story that the cop stood over him and shot him in the back as he was laying on the street.
Also, every single one of these people who did not see any of it but did happen to hear it in the distance, all agree... every single one of them agree! - to a man, woman and child - that the shooting was "for no good reason ... for no reason at all".
I only heard one single voice in the background that was out of sync with the other voices .... from a man who actually saw what happened, and who said that Brown had an altercation with the cop in the "truck" (police SUV), was "over the truck," was heading away from the cop at first before turning around and coming back at the cop, and who had so many shots fired at him (as he approached the cop) with no apparent effect that the witness repeatedly stated he thought the cop deliberately missed him (hmm... "missed" as in "repeated warning shots"?).
So I'm confused as to the differing stories!
Obviously there's something wrong with the single visual testimony, since it contradicts all the many aural testimonies. Obviously there is an incredible amount of information inherent just in the sound of a gunshot in the distance that tells people instantly the entire story behind the shots, eg who was the victim, who was the perp, the exact motivation of the perp, etc etc.
OTOH, a witness who is unfortunate enough to have seen as well as heard the shooting, will naturally be confused by irrelevant images (eg of Brown rushing the cop) popping up all over his memory banks, interspersed everywhere with the audio memories of the gunshots and interfering with those memories, thus rendering him an unreliable witness. As opposed to all of the others, who had only pure clean *audio* memories of gunshot sounds that were unpolluted by visual memories and thus make them infinitely more reliable witnesses.
QED
They usually take weeks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.