Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark

Somehow I must have missed the part of the article that indicated the defendant was compelled to be a witness against himself in court.

I guess it must be there somewhere. Can you show me that from the article?


161 posted on 08/15/2014 11:10:25 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe
Somehow I must have missed the part of the article that indicated the defendant was compelled to be a witness against himself in court.

Witness; Def #3: to bear witness to; testify to; give or afford evidence of.

If his silence, and his speech, both can be used to give or afford evidence of his guilt, then there is no way that he cannot but witness against himself. Period.

I guess it must be there somewhere. Can you show me that from the article?

Nope; just plain logic.
(Namely, Morton's Fork.)

163 posted on 08/16/2014 12:22:53 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson