This is diversity and anti-discrimination you see, and it validates Evan Sayet’s theories on liberal thinking quite perfectly.
See, crapping inside versus outside your pants are two equivocal outcomes, neither better than the other, and if you are so unfortunately myopic as to favor one outcome over the other, why, you are a bigot. You’re a shittist! You clearly cannot overcome your biases, your white privelege (if you happen to be white) or your underpriveleged upbringing if you happen not to be. Too bad for you, the benefits of diversity will surely elude you so long as you are run by your biases, your conditioning.
After all, there is nothing objectively wrong with walking around smelling like a toilet. There’s no discomfort walking around with excess liquid or solid matter inside your drawers. Any reaction to these events are simply the product of societal conditioning you’d obviously be so much better off without. Smelling offensively to others, or leaving your various residues on furniture belonging to others, hey, those are clearly value judgments of dubious value.
The great part is that if you think crapping in your pants is no better than crapping outside your pants, think of what a great president you could think we have!
What’s indeed interesting about this IMO is how the peer pressure (or maybe it’s the pressure to get a good grade in Prof Fahs’ bodily function festival class) can actually cause people of otherwise common sense to forego same. It’s true of smoking, as an obvious example; an activity most people are revulsed by the first time or three they try it; but there, there is this pressure or impetus to be “cool”.
Walking around with a turd in your pants, though, that’s an exciting new frontier in societal development.
Forward!
One thing we do know about walking around with crap in your pants .... if you’re also wearing an underwear bomb, it might not work so well.
*snicker*