Posted on 07/15/2014 10:08:21 AM PDT by PoloSec
Is “Operation Choke Point” about to get choked by Congress? Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., sure hopes so.
Issa, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, is calling for the dismantling of what he calls a secretive initiative launched by the Obama administration in early 2013.
Critics say that Operation Choke Point, so dubbed by Department of Justice officials under Attorney General Eric Holder, seeks to weed out businesses from the marketplace that the Obama administration considers objectionable. According to The Wall Street Journal, it was an outgrowth of the Financial Fraud Task Force, established by President Obama’s executive order early in his first term.
The initiative, Issa said last week, is a slippery slope:
“If you empower the government to pick winners and losers within a lawful enterprise, then there is no place to stop.”
Initially, in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, officials targeted small-dollar, nonbank lenders. But it grew to include other legal, legitimate businesses such as gun dealers and tobacco vendors at Walmart and Bass Pro Shop.
Issa, speaking on Operation Choke Point at Cato Institute, called it “proactive, progressive activity” by government against banks and other legitimate businesses.
“Fraud should be prosecuted,” Norbert Michel, research fellow in financial regulations at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal. “They don’t have to use the banking system to shut out every single player in an industry to do that.”
House Republicans already have passed legislation prohibiting funding for Operation Choke Point. This week, the Justice Department initiative comes under further scrutiny in three House settings:
This morning at 10, the oversight and investigations subcommittee of the Financial Services Committee was scheduled to hold a hearing on the Justice Department initiative. Today at 2 p.m., the Financial Services Committee’s subcommittee on financial institutions was set to hold a hearing on a new bill by Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-Mo.), the “End Operation Choke Point Act of 2014.” Thursday at 9:30 a.m., the Judiciary Committee’s subcommittee on regulatory reform will hold a hearing entitled “Guilty Until Proven Innocent?” on whether Justice has the legal authority to execute the operation and possible collateral damage to legitimate businesses.
One official at Justice, quoted anonymously in a Wall Street Journal report last summer, said the initiative was intended to change “the structures within the financial system that allow all kinds of fraudulent merchants to operate,” with the intent of “choking them off from the very air they need to survive.”
By “air,”the DOJ means money. The Obama administration uses Operation Choke Point to intimidates banks from doing business with merchants it deems “high risk,” Issa and other critics say.
>>> Operation Choke Point: FDIC Cooperated with Justice Department
For example, Issa said in his remarks last week, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation officials make “inappropriate” phone calls to banks and payday lenders, pressuring them to sever ties with businesses the government considers “reputational risks.”
Mark Calabria, Cato’s director of financial regulation studies, said FDIC pressure is an enormous weight over the financial industry.
“When the federal government maintains the discretion to decide which bank gets rescued and which does not, it should be clear that banks in practice have little choice but to cooperate,” Calabria said.
Despite his opposition to the initiative, Issa has yet to endorse legislation to end Operation Choke Point. Instead, he said:
We’ve got to do what baseball pitchers do anytime somebody’s crowding the plate. And that is, we’re going to put the ball close enough that either they’re going to jump back, or we’re going to hit them with the ball. … What they’re doing is wrong, and we’ve got to show that.
Lawmakers Throw Light on Secretive ‘Operation Choke Point’
************
Lawmakers. Now that’s a archaic concept. We don’t need no stinkin’ lawmakers anymore. We have a president with a pen and a phone. /sarc
Cute metaphors do nothing to fix anything.
How would the New York Times and Washington Post react IF a Republican decided to 'weed out' liberal type companies? Maybe 'weed out' newspapers?
Can the effing press put down their biases long enough to see what Obama's thugs are doing? God, I hope so...
Impeach ...
Might want to run that past Learner.
Just an extension of the regulatory enforcement bias already perpetrated by every name your ABC agency.
This program needs to be ended.
In all likelihood, the press is both hostage to and complicit with this administration. Hostage, as in White House access, and thus news-worthy relevance and thus money is at stake should anyone rock the boat... but then, why rock the boat when this is basically the ultimate fantasy-come-true of the intolerant liberal left that infests the MSM?
I really want to believe this is just a case of a myopic administration brimming with incompetent intellectual slobs, it’s almost hard to believe anything else given the history, but the frightening possibility is that these people know exactly what they’re doing.
You're right John... It's strange. But I hope and pray these people are narcissistic and incompetent - that's so much better than the alternative. But like you I sense they know what they're doing - it's frightening. (Oh, and I'm honored you would take the time to comment to me... thanks.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.