Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

Marijuana is not an infectious disease. It is not spread through casual contact. It is not spread through any contact. This comparison is beyond ridiculous.

Prohibition brought us organized crime and widespread disrespect for law and order. It really never works the way prohibitionists think it will. The answer to drug problems (and alcoholism, gluttony, gambling problems, etc.) is education, not hysterics.

I am done debating you because I’ve got better things to do than waste any more time.


305 posted on 07/08/2014 8:51:33 AM PDT by EricT. (Everything not forbidden is compulsory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]


To: EricT.
If the goal of debating were to make him see reason, you'd be wasting your time. My goal is to use him as a demonstration of the bankruptcy of the prohibitionist position - YMMV.
307 posted on 07/08/2014 9:07:57 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]

To: EricT.
Marijuana is not an infectious disease. It is not spread through casual contact. It is not spread through any contact. This comparison is beyond ridiculous.

Your inability to grasp the point does not make it false. So tell me, how does Marijuana usage spread?

Prohibition brought us organized crime and widespread disrespect for law and order.

We had organized crime before, and much of their success in bootlegging alcohol was based on the fact that a significant portion of the populace never supported that law in the first place. It is the disagreement with the law that brought about disrespect for it.

Laws should reflect the will of the majority, not those of some temporary minority that manages to grasp power for a short time. As Edmund Burke said:

The use of force alone is but temporary. It may subdue for a moment; but it does not remove the necessity of subduing again: and a nation is not governed, which is perpetually to be conquered.

As for prohibitions in general, it would appear to me that the fallacy of their effort was the speed and means by which they pushed it. It was all at once, and draconian.

Efforts to slowly strangle off tobacco usage (and thereby produce a defacto "prohibition") are showing more promise. Had the prohibitionists utilized similar tactics, they may have achieved their objective without all the negative results.

313 posted on 07/08/2014 10:10:18 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson