Posted on 05/23/2014 6:45:17 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Pour encourager les autres
“A lot of people won’t vote for the liberal republican anymore.”
I respect that. We each have to do what we think is best. All I ask is that both sides show respect for the other. It’s clear that many conservatives are in a quandary over voting for the lesser evil. I know I am. It’s not an easy thing to do. I just don’t think electing Democrats is a very good alternative. We know they’ll vote against us 100% of the time.
But like every other Democrat, you will vote 100% for everything this Marxist president wants. Look at Manchin’s and Pryor’s voting records. They carry Obama’s water as faithfully as Charles Schumer and Elijah Cummings do.
/johnny
Well, Ginsberg isn’t working out well for me at all, LOL. However, a president has the right to nominate people who share his ideology. The senate has advice and consent, but what would happen if someone like Ginsberg was not approved. A leftist president would simply appoint another just like her. I would personally vote to toss a few nominations out if I was a senator—hoping for someone better—but Republicans have generally played nice. That’s pretty foolish given the modern Democrat party. Sadly, I see little evidence the GOPe is ready to treat Democrats like they’ve treated us.
Oh, one thing I know for sure. Had a Democrat been in Mitch’s seat for the Ginsberg vote, it wouldn’t have changed anything. That’s why I question the strategy of voting Democrat to remove RINOs. That’s like jumping from the frying pan into the fire, my FRiend.
I’d vote for the Democrat myself, since it’s now the only way to get rid of Mick.
So looking at the long term, and thinking strategically, removing a 'leader' that is liberal is moving America in the right direction.
Keeping around a liberal republican who will vote to grow the government and reduce freedoms won't ever get you where you want to go.
History proves it. Voting for the 'lesser evil' doesn't make for more conservative governance. It makes for more liberal governance.
/johnny
want Republicans and Democrats to work together
NO! That is the problem with establishment Republicans; they are willing to “work together” with Dims to further the Dim agenda, just not as fast as the Dims want to do! We want Republicans to STOP the Dim agenda!
Interesting. Have any of his judicial appointments been blocked? Supreme Court Appointments?
I am just wondering if Alison Grimes would be any better or any worse than McConnell.
Believe me, I do not know.
Guys, at this point you don’t have a choice; you need to vote for the RINO. Sorry, but we need the seat and we’ll have to look for conservatives to nullify his influence in other districts.
/johnny
I have the same problem every six years when McCain comes up. I can’t vote for the stupid token Democrat, but there is no way I can vote for McCain. I just leave it blank.
No. Mitch burned those bridges with gusto
Mitch is not “we”
Voting out a liberal leader might make sense, but we already had our chance to vote in a conservative and lost. In other words, our current choice is between a liberal Republican leader and a statist Democrat. I agree that’s a real dilemma for someone who wants to push the country to the right, but I also don’t think Mitch is as liberal as you imply.
In what way will a Democrat in that seat give us a better chance than we already had (in the primary) of turning the country conservative? It’s a six year job. That’s a very long time for the Democrat to do damage, and we know that’s guaranteed. A Republican moderate (or liberal) will at least work with us some of the time.
BTW, we still have an opportunity to take down Thad Cochran, and that in itself would be a good reminder to the moderate wing to behave.
I vote neither
Interesting. Have any of his judicial appointments been blocked?
Millions. That is why Reid has the Nuclear Option and getting every appointment through because McConnell and company were stoping all the appointments. Soon Reid will be doing that to bills. If we don’t get the Senate, Reid is going to have everything 50 votes to pass. It is going to be ugly.....but getting rid of McConnell seems to be more important.
He'll allow the dems to bring up whatever amendments they want.
That's the damage he can do.
And your feelings don't matter. What matters is that you won't convince a LOT of conservatives to vote for Mitch after he burned so many bridges.
He won by 6% last general election, with a lousy Dem candidate. Grimes is a much better candidate. Couple that with conservatives that will remember that Mitch said he would destroy them when he found them, and I think Grimes will win in November anyway.
/johnny
One other thing about this race. The media is saying it was a blow out for Mitch McConnell. That couldn’t be farther from the truth, because an incumbent Republican minority leader only got 60% of his own party’s vote? Given all the advantages of being not only an incumbent but a leader, the vote should have been more like 80%. Blevin got 35%, and that’s a very big block of Republican voters. If Mitch doesn’t convince the lion’s share of those to support him in the general election, his goose is cooked.
/johnny
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.