Presenting....common cores critical thinking standard. Could debate possibly get any dumber?
1 posted on
05/20/2014 7:19:40 AM PDT by
Antioch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
To: Antioch
I’d bet good money that the speaker of this Ebonics gibberish was a black student. How else could one get away with using that word in public?
32 posted on
05/20/2014 8:30:32 AM PDT by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Only Liberals can look at an amendment that says "shall not be infringed" and see blank parchment.)
To: Antioch
Idiocracy in real life. Drink Brawndo (it has electrolytes)
33 posted on
05/20/2014 9:04:23 AM PDT by
PBinTX
To: Antioch; caligatrux; ZULU
Hacking Traditional College Debate's White Privilege (gag) Problem -- more insight into the competition. It raises interesting points (i.e., traditional debaters have considered setting up an alternative "traditional only" debate, but when it was found that it was largely WHITE, there were howls of protest. This from those who propose to set up their "own" black basketball league.
"Critics of the new approach allege that students dont necessarily have to develop high-level research skills or marshal evidence from published scholarship. They also might not need to have the intellectual acuity required for arguing both sides of a resolution. These skillstogether with a non-confrontational presentation styleare considered crucial for success in fields like law and business."
As you said, common core.
36 posted on
05/20/2014 4:35:35 PM PDT by
cyn
(Benghazi)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson