Once again, you are incorrect.
“You can purchase land for building a garage, a house, a store, or other building”
In no way prohibits the use of the land purchased for grazing or growing timber or letting sit fallow. It is descriptive not restrictive.
The land belongs to the US Government and as the owner, they get to decide what happens to that land. I would point out that the parcel in question is part of a larger tract of land that does have “other buildings” on that land. Things like visitor centers and maintenance buildings are common on government lands out west. So at the very least, even using the most obtrusive and restrictive language of the Constitution, the government still owns the land and still qualifies under the “other buildings” portion of the clause.
Specific examples. If you then build yourself a sports stadium, you are violating the limits of the terms.
Your "other buildings" argument falls apart BECAUSE THERE ARE NO BUILDINGS.
https://asci.uvm.edu/equine/law/fence/nv_fnc.htm
Please review this website. Then give us your comments about fencing and open range grazing.
Things like visitor centers and maintenance buildings are common on government lands out west.
Interesting. There doesn't seem to be any on the 10,000 or so acres in the immediate vicinity of my section...