Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stevie_d_64
According to the report, the proposals are designed to direct more of the tax preference for retirement savings toward getting more low- and middle-income people into the habit of saving.

What type of logic says if you tax more by reducing the amount of the deductible on the higher income employees (normally officers of the company), that will be an incentive for the lower earner into saving more?

"Gee, my boss is getting screwed by the government, I think I will add 2 % to my 401 K contribution"

More like I'm next...to get the screw

And a third potential problem, said Schweiss, is that the more restrictions on tax benefits we impose on retirement plans, the less attractive it will become for a business owner to sponsor a plan. “And who loses then?” he asked “The worker, not the business owner.”

Oh' Wait the "evil" business owner offers the plan....

Well, guess what: he wants to take advantage of the 401 K rules and defer his taxes as well, take away the incentive to do so and he may not want to deal with all the administrative costs in having a 401 k and just give his employees a different plan like "Here's your bi-weekly $25.00 saving bond"

36 posted on 02/22/2014 4:19:34 AM PST by Popman ("Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God" - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Popman

Simple. There will be no more business owners.

Because “It’s the right thing to do”.


38 posted on 02/22/2014 6:41:11 AM PST by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson