Skip to comments.
Labeling of genetically engineered food trailing in initial returns
Seattle Times ^
| 11/5/2013
| Sandi Doughton
Posted on 11/05/2013 9:02:04 PM PST by djwright
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 last
To: Toddsterpatriot
But none of them contributed to the anti campaign. Monsanto and the other big boys did to the tune of $22,000,000. In-state contributions amounted to $550.
61
posted on
11/07/2013 9:23:52 AM PST
by
vox_freedom
(America is being tested as never before in its history. May God help us.)
To: vox_freedom
Monsanto and the other big boys did to the tune of $22,000,000. The sellers contributed, the users didn't. Okay.
62
posted on
11/07/2013 2:05:12 PM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
To: vox_freedom
This isn’t about the cost of ink to add a few words to the label. It is about the process to verify claims of GMO free and the testing to prove whether something does or doesn’t have GMO.
Do you take vitamins? They are basically unregulated. Why aren’t you demanding testing and labeling of vitamins and herbal supplements?
63
posted on
11/10/2013 10:27:11 AM PST
by
djwright
(Inpeach Teleprompter)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson