To: xzins
Liz Wiehl on Imus this morning (Imus and Liz are idiots) declared that there's no doubt that Zimmerman caused the event, but that he'd be acquitted because the evidence is on his side. I would love to see the evidence she's using to show "he caused it." It doesn't exist. If his "causing it" is SO FLIPPIN' OBVIOUS, then he'd be convicted. And Imus was cheering in the background because he's afraid of them "nappy headed words" of his years ago. Zimmerman "caused" it by interrupting Trayvon as he was casing apartments, looking for good burglary targets. You're not supposed to interfere with Holder's People.
210 posted on
07/11/2013 6:45:47 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
To: PapaBear3625
haha! Bill S just called the foam dummy a “blow up doll”!
220 posted on
07/11/2013 6:49:29 AM PDT by
MNDude
(Sorry for typos. Probably written on a smartphone, and I have big clumsy fingers.)
To: PapaBear3625
I can tell you this, most reasonable people on a jury, if after a conviction found out the hidden evidence of TM prior acts, (especially the jewelry he claimed he was holding for a friend) would feel blindsided and lied to.
224 posted on
07/11/2013 6:50:29 AM PDT by
Toespi
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson