“Acts of capitalism between consenting adults.”
She didn’t consent to have her pictures put up on the web. He either needs to make restitution, or he needs to go to jail.
Yep. I believe in the assumption of privacy in such cases unless it can be demonstrated she sent it out and shared it in a public fashion herself.
Thank you!!!
“She didn’t consent to have her pictures put up on the web. He either needs to make restitution, or he needs to go to jail.”
That argument won’t hold up, I think, or someone better shut down Facebook, faaaast.
For argument’s sake (still thinking about the legal issues on this; morally it’s a no-brainer - wrong): She gave to him a digital file specifically for his possession, i.e. ownership. That makes the photo his property with all usage rights unless otherwise noted. In this case the exemption was “understood”, but not specifically written and agreed upon.
He’s a dick, but it may not be illegal (assuming she’s over 18).
Sure, that will fix it: Let's create a liability for the taxpayers who will have to pay to feed and house this person while he is serving his sentence; all because:
Wait for it...
Wait for it...
Wait for it...
some young woman failed to understand that decisions have consequences. Some immediate, others at an unknown future time and place, but none the less, there are consequences. While I find it repulsive what has happened to her, I find no sympathy in my heart. She brought it upon herself and permitted it to happen by recording or permitting the recording of herself via digital media.
Modesty, good decision making skills, and understanding that all actions / decisions have consequences are elusive in today's society and we all suffer from their absence.
She gave him the pictures. He can do what he wants with them. Or, did they have a contract limiting there use?
Is that a clause in the fornication, shack-up contract?