That’s not what I heard.
I heard Paul say if the American takes up arms against the U.S. in a war zone(Middle East), shoot him. He relinquishes his Constitutional protections
when he takes up arms on foreign soil.
His question was what about doing it in the U.S.? Several officials have declared the War on Terror is worldwide and includes the U.S.
Does that make drone strikes on our soil legal?
The answers he got were, hypothetical, unlikely, only if the terrorist could not be captured any other way or it was too difficult.
And then the question as to whether said terrorist was actually in the act of a terrorist strike or merely sitting at a sidewalk cafe unarmed.
Collateral damage, convoys carrying the perp plus others came up also.
Who could be defined as a terrorist ‘worthy’ of having a kill order place on them?
I thought he was spot on.
The Bill of Rights refresher course he presented alone was worth the hours of watching. I couldn’t put it down.
Then why is Rand against the war on Al Qaeda and why is he quoting CODE PINK, ANSWER, all the left wing anti-war groups, to include ADAM KOKESH THE TRAITOR by claiming
” it is perpetual war”
war that we didn’t start, yet RAND wants to stop fighting back
that means he is surrendering, he is a DHIMMI