Posted on 02/03/2013 9:11:04 AM PST by EXCH54FE
Senseless advice and nothing nice; thats what little-girls-in-combat policy is made of.
The obvious has already been said about placing women in front-line combat positions. Their presence will reduce unit cohesiveness; male soldiers natural instinct to protect women will influence battlefield decisions; there will be the problem of sexual impropriety within the ranks and of rape when women are captured; women will have more trouble measuring up to the physical and psychological demands of battle; special accommodations will no doubt be made so that women may tend to feminine concerns; and, as the high pregnancy rate aboard naval vessels has proven, having young men and women operate in close quarters is folly. Yet the truth is that it was just a matter of time before women were allowed in combat; its a piece that fits seamlessly into the modern sex-role puzzle. And its not surprising if a majority of Americans support the policy; they are sex-role puzzled.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
All discussions of such pregnancies fail to address a major component: the father. Somebody contributed, and has a base natural interest in the outcome - even if he remains anonymous.
If that were to happen, only non-muslims will be forced to report for the draft.
Muslims do not want to owe allegiance to non-muslim countries.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.