Is there anyone who is so psychotic and pathological that you would say, dont let that man have a gun?
If not, then your position is clear. But it denies mental illness. I assume you do not think anyone is mentally ill, right?
Of course, but that is MY subjective opinion.
No, I've, as well as others here, have asked how to define it. And more importantly, who is going to define it.
Who would you trust with the ability to start denying God Given rights to others?
How about a "Rights" tsar?
The real point here us, if you can start taking rights from some because you or a majority think it is okay, especially in view of such a tragedy, then they're really not rights....are they? (FFA 1968 ring a bell?)