Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuffaloJack

It depends on which “Asian” one is talking about.

Lumping all people of Asian descent together for a political/sociological analysis is beyond stupid. Eastern Russians, Turks, Arabs, Persians, Pashtuns, Hindis and Uzbeks, for example, are not, by any stretch, the same as Koreans, Han Chinese or Japanese.


62 posted on 11/26/2012 11:36:23 AM PST by mkboyce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: mkboyce

I live in SGV......We are talking about Chinese predomitantly. And to a lesser extent, Phillipinos, Koreans and Japanese. The rest you mention are not in the statistics to the degree necessary to effect the numbers.


69 posted on 11/26/2012 12:05:13 PM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: mkboyce

Bingo.

However remember China is the big Asian country.

It makes a difference in the voting patterns, when there are 1.3 billion or so fellows, out there taking advantage of “trade” which really isn’t trade at all.

Further off, Indians are also quite liberal.

We need a new approach. The current approach is broken.


101 posted on 11/27/2012 6:04:56 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson