Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Safrguns
"It was bad enough they didn’t have security for an ambassador... but no security for prisoners???"

I believe no prisoners were hurt during the transfer of arms..

29 posted on 11/12/2012 8:01:11 PM PST by uncommonsense (Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: uncommonsense

>>> I believe no prisoners were hurt during the transfer of arms..

lol... thats not what I meant. I’m sure the prisoners if there were any were liberated.

Whether your prison is covert or exposed, the mission of it’s security is two-fold... keep prisoners from escaping, and keep outsiders from liberating them.

To me, whether it was right or wrong to hold prisoners at the consolate, I find it totally stupid to do so without adequate security to prevent what was bound to happen.

Is Obama this stupid??? I don’t believe ANYONE can be this stupid... therefore I can only assume he WANTED it to happen.


39 posted on 11/13/2012 4:21:11 AM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson