Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Libloather

My guess is that their is legally little they can do because of the statute of limitations. As a result the medial will report on it and then sweep it under the rug.


3 posted on 10/01/2012 3:56:07 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Blood of Tyrants

What statute of limitations?

Is that why Granny Warren resigned her law license in NJ Sept 12, 2012?

They would have sanctioned her in NJ???????


4 posted on 10/01/2012 3:59:01 PM PDT by preamble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants
I may be wrong about this, but I believe a statute of limitations in a civil case would be extended for a limited period of time if factual information that wasn't known previously becomes known to a party of interest.

In any case, I suspect there wouldn't be any action taken by anyone in the Mass. bar association or the state government because the statute of limitation probably would apply in that case. But if someone had hired Elizabeth Warren to represent them and they ended up losing the case, they could very well take legal action against her for professional misconduct or even fraud (which tends to have a pretty long statute of limitations).

5 posted on 10/01/2012 4:01:08 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson