NOW he is at half the funds?
This is either an attempt to dispirit us, or they were lying before....
Am I missing something? Does this explain Romney's slow rollout of ads? Just yesterday the National Review reported the Romney camp was "flush" with cash.
The GOP advantage is in the SuperPACs. Rove, the Kochs, Adelman, and others; we’re talking maybe a half billion dollars. The Democrats have Union and SuperPAC money, but only about half.
I do think this is disinformation to discourage. I saw some tweet night before last saying Romney borrowed 20 million in August and is in debt 11 million. Never heard anymore about it so I think it is another lie to demoralize. Sounds like the libtards have been talking to media matters or something to coordinate the story.
It’s very possible that Romney has already spent a lot of his money on ads that are yet to run. There is only a limited amount of TV ad space available, and I would bet the Romney campaign locked as much of it up as possible as soon as they were allowed to spend the money.
Nothing new here. Obama had led in donations all along; he was only telling his base he was behind (through his contorted math formulas I guess). Here’s a couple of sites to keep up with the $$: http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/index.php and http://www.campaignmoney.com/
Yes but here is the deal. Zero will not spend all of that money because he can keep it after he loses. I predict he’ll keep 40+ million. That leaves him with 40 or so.
But our superpacs are not included here. We have way more money in our superpacs and Barry has little here.
Scream and yell if you wish, but I believe going down with the ship’ as heroic as it sounds won't buy our kids and grandkids the future they deserve.