Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt Romney's Sparse Campaign Schedule Worries Some Republicans
LATimes ^ | September 19, 2012 | Seema Mehta and Mitchell Landsberg

Posted on 09/19/2012 9:49:06 PM PDT by Steelfish

Mitt Romney's Sparse Campaign Schedule Worries Some Republicans Mitt Romney has been holding fewer public campaign events than John McCain did in 2008. He has spent a lot of time fundraising away from key swing states.

By Seema Mehta and Mitchell Landsberg September 19, 2012

When the political conventions ended in 2008, GOP candidate John McCain bounded around the country like a jack rabbit. In three days, he went from Wisconsin to Michigan to Colorado to New Mexico to Missouri, with multiple campaign appearances in some of those states.

Mitt Romney's schedule this year has presented quite a contrast.

In his first two days of campaigning after the conventions, Romney visited Iowa, New Hampshire and Virginia, with one stop in each state. Then he went home to Boston and took a day off from the campaign trail.

That, as it turns out, has been Romney's most active period of campaigning since the presidential contest moved into its crucial post-convention stage. Although his campaign says he is about to accelerate his pace, Romney so far has held far fewer public events than either presidential candidate did four years ago, and has spent a significant amount of time in states — Massachusetts, California, New York, Texas — that are not considered up for grabs in November

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: mccain; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: GR_Jr.

The most recent trends are looking good for Romney


61 posted on 09/20/2012 4:07:38 AM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GR_Jr.; Steelfish
Romney is either campaigning like a guy who knows he is comfortably ahead (like Nixon in ‘72) or is campaigning like a guy who doesn’t want to win. Which is true, I don’t know.

My guess is that romney may know how deep a hole we're in. Maybe he doesn't want to take 4 years of blame for the growing disaster.

62 posted on 09/20/2012 5:02:26 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Okay, I always go back to Perot. In spite of being a nutcase, in spite of dropping out of the race and jumping back in, Perot got 19% of the vote. He persuaded almost 1 in 5 voters to vote for a candidate with no chance to win.

How did he do it? He did it with substance. Perot bought (hour or half-hour) of network time for 3 shows. Perot presented information using his charts.

I'm a news junkie and I haven't seen a thing about Romney other than his "gaffe", since the Dem Convention. The media is blacking him out. He has to go around the media straight to the American People. Romney needs to give a "CEO" presentation on the situation in the US and the risk of complete financial collapse going with Obama. Then present his plan to turn this thing around.

Romney is betting everything on the debates. Romney has a distinct strategic disadvantage in the debates. The questioners are liberals out to protect Obama. Obama will be allowed to lie, lie, lie. The media will then back Obama up with his lies and scream about how Romney "lost" the debate.

Mitt, you're a CEO. Play to your strength, not Obama's. Put together a power point presentation for the American People, buy the time and do a Perot. That's how you get your precious independents, who are concerned about the deficit and debt.

Going State to State with rallies ain't gonna hack it.

63 posted on 09/20/2012 5:45:25 AM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (.Are they stupid, malicious or evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

“Romney is some 22 points behind Obama on the empathy issue”

But that doesn’t mean they’ll vote for Obama.

Someone said, maybe Levin yesterday, that this is not a race between two individuals but between two ways of running the country. Hopefully citizens will see that our Socialism experiment now under way is not working and must be abandoned.


64 posted on 09/20/2012 5:51:35 AM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: berdie

“The current way of campaigning needs to be revamped”

The candidates can campaign any way they wish.


65 posted on 09/20/2012 5:55:14 AM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Whenever I need to find out what’s going on with the Romney campaign, I immediately turn to the left wing liars and propagandists at the LA Times.


66 posted on 09/20/2012 6:00:24 AM PDT by sergeantdave (The FBI has declared war on the Marine Corps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anima Mundi

The conditioning of women to vote Democrat was set up with the Great Society. No longer do men have to stick around and raise their children. U.S. taxpayers will do it for him.

Men can just alley cat around siring child after child, then just slink along to the next warm bed they can find. No strings attached. Kids get free lunches, free daycare, free healthcare, free clothing, and free housing.

Women are not blameless. Why should they care if the father of their children is never seen again? More fun to have the soup of the day. The check will come in the mail and they don’t have to worry about being smacked around at night. If the government check stops, they may actually have to keep their legs shut and demand accountability from the slugs that shirk the responsibilities of being a man.

It’s a horribly destructive cycle brought to you by your “caring” Democrats. The whole nation is being brought to its knees because of it.

It’s 49% today, tomorrow it may be 50% or 55% or more if we don’t elect R/R. We still have a chance short term. Long term, I don’t know. It will be up to the young adults of today to decide what kind of future they want. There aren’t enough of us mature adults to determine that any more.

Go Romney/Ryan.


67 posted on 09/20/2012 6:05:41 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

This election will be decided by the debates. The small percentage of undecideds will move one way or another based on what they see there. If Romney is prepared, and does well, this will just end up being more sniping by people who like attention but don’t have a clue as to what it takes to win a presidential election with a hostile media.


68 posted on 09/20/2012 6:31:21 AM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jabba the Nutt

Fully agree. No matter what, the MSM will spin Obama as being cool, in command of the facts, Romney as a flip-flopper, and show Obama as the winner. We don’t have an educated electorate anymore where despite Obama’s dismal record, nearly 50% automatically support him. I don’t agree with the Perot charts either. Romney must run non-stop 24/7 ads on the Rats booing God during the DNC, Obama in 2008 and Obama in 2012 in his own words, broken promises. Run ads showing the ME in flames and intersperse extracts from his Cairo speech. In short appeal to emotion. This is sad but true. Times have changed. It works for the Rats.


69 posted on 09/20/2012 9:28:34 AM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2
Romney Dewey doesn’t have to do anything but “not be Obama Truman”; the burden is on ObamaTruman to make the case that he deserves re-election, and it is very difficult to do so.


70 posted on 09/20/2012 11:32:06 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

We’ll see how it shakes out; at this point it has become clear that anything Romney says will be twisted into something anti-women, anti-black, anti-gay, blah blah blah.


71 posted on 09/20/2012 2:45:51 PM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic war against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

You are exactly right. It is a well established fact that overwhelming majority of MSM reporters are liberal democrats. SO Romney or any other republican is not likely to get favorable press coverage in any big city.


72 posted on 09/21/2012 9:54:08 AM PDT by entropy12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson