“I do not discount the possibility of word getting to Roberts that voting to shoot down Obamacare could be hazardous to his family’s health.”
I find that after reading hundreds of opinions regarding the Roberts Decision, a threat of actual, physical violence presented with proof of intent (horse head in bed?) seems to be the only consistent conclusion. It also would not surprise me that Roberts is in Malta picking out his next and last place of residence to which he will soon retire. With that in mind, when he announces his retirement will demonstrate if he is a closet liberal or simply leaving the country for health reasons. If he retires before Duh Won is out of office, he gives the left a shot at a liberal majority in the SC and can be safely considered a closet leftist.
And while I find the Roberts Decision to hocus-pocus in general, I welcome any decision that limits the Commerce Clause.
Didn’t Roberts say the law could not be upheld under the Commerce Clause, meaning it violated the Commerce Clause?
The Roberts decision made no limitation of the Commerce Clause.
There is no silver lining in his opinion.