To: little jeremiah
Can’t he (Roberts) just come up with a straight, non-nuanced decision based upon the principles of the US Constitution? All this triangulation is a headache. Wouldn’t we rather just have Scalia, Thomas or Alito write up the correct decision?
3 posted on
06/28/2012 9:13:59 PM PDT by
tflabo
(Truth or tyranny)
To: tflabo
"Can’t he (Roberts) just come up with a straight, non-nuanced decision based upon the principles of the US Constitution? All this triangulation is a headache. Wouldn’t we rather just have Scalia, Thomas or Alito write up the correct decision?"
Kennedy did. He said the entire law was "un-Constitutional" and Scalia, Thomas, and Alito agreed. Roberts made new law, along with the libs on the court.
174 posted on
06/29/2012 1:40:55 AM PDT by
A Navy Vet
(An Oath is Forever)
To: tflabo
” Can’t he (Roberts) just come up with a straight, non-nuanced decision based upon the principles of the US Constitution? “
NO !!!! everything inside the boundry of DC is beyond corrupt
191 posted on
06/29/2012 3:26:25 AM PDT by
SF_Redux
(Sarah stands for accountablility and personal responsiblity, democrats can't live with that)
To: tflabo
“Can’t he (Roberts) just come up with a straight, non-nuanced decision based upon the principles of the US Constitution? All this triangulation is a headache. “
Lawyerspeak. Shakespeare was right about lawyers.
214 posted on
06/29/2012 6:01:11 AM PDT by
HereInTheHeartland
("The writing is on the wall - Unions are screwed. reformist2 10:04 PM #27")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson