Skip to comments.
Why Iran Should Get the Bomb
Foreign Affairs ^
| July/August 2012
| Kenneth N. Waltz
Posted on 06/27/2012 11:11:56 AM PDT by nickcarraway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: nickcarraway
Wow...we actualy found someone with a zero IQ.
To: nickcarraway
Why Iran Should Get the Bomb or
Why Iran SHOULD GET BOMBED
3
posted on
06/27/2012 11:16:54 AM PDT
by
Paul46360
To: nickcarraway
The Saudis gave China an open ended contract to supply them with nukes to protect themselves form the insane Iran leaders. Give Iran a bomb and Israel will be their first target. I guess some want a nuclear war.
4
posted on
06/27/2012 11:18:25 AM PDT
by
mountainlion
(I am voting for Sarah after getting screwed again by the DC Thugs.)
To: nickcarraway
Some delusions are just too stupid to comment upon
5
posted on
06/27/2012 11:18:25 AM PDT
by
Nifster
To: nickcarraway
I think the the school of thought is called “defensive realism”. Nuclear weapons are “defensive” weapons that deter attack. And a stable balance of power is the guarantee of peace.
To: nickcarraway
The author is missing one itty-bitty, tiny crumb of information that really negates his entire position.
IRAN HAS REPEATEDLY AFFIRMED THAT THEY INTEND TO WIPE ISRAEL OF THE FACE OF THE EARTH (alah willing).
That is kind of important as Iran would not be able to remotely consider forcing that issue with conventional military engagement.
7
posted on
06/27/2012 11:23:23 AM PDT
by
Tenacious 1
(The Click-&-Paste Media exists & works in Utopia, riding unicorns & sniffing pixy dust.)
To: nickcarraway
Once Iran crosses the nuclear threshold, deterrence will apply, even if the Iranian arsenal is relatively small. All his arguments assume rational players.
In the real world, Iran is run by people who believe that if they can initiate World War IV, they can coax Imam XII out of his little well and they will go to heaven.
8
posted on
06/27/2012 11:23:37 AM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: nickcarraway
Israel's regional nuclear monopoly, which has proved remarkably durable for the past four decades, has long fueled instability in the Middle East
Been a long time since I've seen something so breathtakingly stupid in print.
9
posted on
06/27/2012 11:24:11 AM PDT
by
chrisser
(Starve the Monkeys!)
To: Colonel Kangaroo
yeah and that only works if you are not dealing with people who believe in the 12th Imam
10
posted on
06/27/2012 11:24:46 AM PDT
by
Nifster
To: nickcarraway
11
posted on
06/27/2012 11:30:03 AM PDT
by
Da Bilge Troll
(Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
To: nickcarraway
I would be in favor of an article “Why we should bomb Iran with Nuclear Weapons.”
12
posted on
06/27/2012 11:31:31 AM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: nickcarraway
The point of this idiot is that if you give a homicidal psychopath the an atomic bomb, that will make them less likely to do something homicidal.
Gosh, where could the flaw be in that logic.
13
posted on
06/27/2012 11:33:23 AM PDT
by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: nickcarraway
Why Iran Should Get the Bomb?
So we can turn their sand into glass.
14
posted on
06/27/2012 11:35:18 AM PDT
by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: SampleMan
So I should have a gun to insure peace, right?
15
posted on
06/27/2012 11:36:23 AM PDT
by
null and void
(Day 1254 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Obama is not a Big Brother [he's a Big Sissy...])
To: nickcarraway
If only there was some way to get that on my garden. I’d grow the biggest vegetables in the world!
To: nickcarraway
The author ascribes old outdated Cold War style “balance” thinking to a regime that believes it can force the islamic messiah The Mahdi to appear by using nukes on their enemies.
The author needs a dose of reality and quick.
17
posted on
06/27/2012 11:39:17 AM PDT
by
Darksheare
(You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
To: null and void
So I should have a gun to insure peace, right? Bad people with weapons are dangerous.
Good people with weapons are stabilizing forces.
The equation does not change whether the weapon is a gun or an atomic bomb.
18
posted on
06/27/2012 11:42:27 AM PDT
by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: null and void; SampleMan
But Nully, you’re not a homicidal psychopath that daily preaches from the rooftops about martyring your friends and neighbors in the hopes of forcing some bigger psychopath to appear and destroy the world.
But you do live in an area that has people of a similar bent.
Uh.. hmm..
Any escape plans yet?
19
posted on
06/27/2012 11:45:53 AM PDT
by
Darksheare
(You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
To: nuconvert; txhurl
20
posted on
06/27/2012 11:46:59 AM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson