GOd I loathe when non-lawyers think they are lawyers. Affidavits for prob cause are nothing BUT allegations not yet put to the test in Court.
Pity the Media is even going to cover this trial.
But don't probable cause affidavits have to set out a factual basis to support the allegations? The affiant has no personal knowledge regarding any of the allegations made and does not recite any facts to support them.
It is not sufficient to simply allege "Zimmerman murdered Martin." That is essentially all this affidavit does.
Of course, it doesn't really matter since this is a political case and a conviction is already assured.
Yes, Rush is not an attorney, but Alan Dershowitz and Mark Levin certainly are. What do you have to say to them? Both of them have declared this affidavit to be trash.