Pelosi: Dems ready to accept Supreme Court verdict on healthcare law

The Hill ^ | March 28, 2012 | Mike Lillis

[jazusamo]

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D) said Wednesday that Democrats will accept the Supreme Court's ruling on her party's healthcare law — whatever it is.

The California liberal – a champion of the bill who was crucial to its passage – said Democrats "were careful to honor the Constitution" in drafting the bill, but would respect the high-court's verdict, however it falls.

"Democrats in the Congress have long-believed in judicial review," Pelosi said during a press briefing in the Capitol. "We respect the third branch of government and the role that they play under our Constitution, and that is a role to have the opportunity to review laws passed by Congress.

"This is part of our constitutional process, and we respect it," she added.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard its third day of arguments on the Democrats' healthcare law, which critics have blasted as unconstitutional since the early stages of the reform debate three years ago. The court is examining the legality of the law's individual insurance mandate, its broad Medicaid expansion and whether one element of the legislation can be repealed without eliminating the entire sweeping statute.

Based on Tuesday's arguments, which focused on the insurance mandate, a number of legal experts have predicted the conservative-leaning court will rule against that central element of the bill.

Pelosi on Wednesday said she feels "pretty good about the merits of the case," but was quick to add that any speculation is just that.

Asked to predict the outcome, she said, "I have no idea – none of us does."

"We are all now talking about something of which we have no knowledge because we're not members of the Supreme Court," Pelosi said. "We have knowledge of the legislation, we have knowledge of the arguments, but we have no rule what the outcome will be."

Breaking with Pelosi, Rep. John Conyers (Mich.), senior Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, stuck his neck out to predict the high court would come down 5 to 4 in favor of the insurance mandate at the heart of the controversy.

Addressing a reporter who suggested otherwise, Conyers said, "I'll be checking with you in June to see which one of us were correct."

[hummingbird]

What is to happen to military TriCare (sic?)?

[freedumb2003]

<<Every word of that bill was written with the Constitution right next to it. After we passed it we read both of them. We had no idea some of the things that were in that Constitution.<<

I was in DC recently and just for the heck of it went on a tour (I have had some work to do there for a few months). When I saw the FDR memorial I wanted to throw up. He invented all kinds of “freedoms” and “rights” that the USC never had, were never envisioned by the framers and, if they were uttered by someone in a 3rd world country we would say were pure socialism bordering on communism.

I hope he is burning in hellfires for what he did to our country.

Then I saw the MLK memorial and did throw up (well in my mouth a little).

[Chaguito]

The.fix.is.in.

[Monorprise]

Nothing as far as I know?

Although if you ask me service men should be put on a private plan of their choosing.

New service men should not be given the option and instead the military should simply agree to compensate them for any and all medical & otherwise expenses related to their service, and make up the difference by paying the more in the first place.

We need to get away from the job benefit model not only in the military but in the private sector as well. All this model does is screw people when their company invariably goes under while denying them the right to do with their money what they please. The side effect of many of theses socialized models is ultimately nothing more than to effect a tragity of the commons in terms of the market.

You quite latterly get nether security, nor freedom with 3rd party management. Our military personnel least of all should be made subject to this. So as much as is possible they should be payed upfront.