[samtheman]

I don’t have to explain anything.

My words stand on their face value.

IF it went down as Zimmerman said, THEN he was justified in shooting.

Period.

That’s what I’m saying and that’s what I’ve been saying.

No matter what the initial detective WANTED to do or didn’t want to do (there are always disagreements between police officers and the police and the DA over evidence and courses of action, no?) the fact is that when they interviewed WITNESSES it seems that the witnesses corroborated Zimmerman’s account.

You want to concoct some conspiracy theory.

All I want to do is keep it simple, stupid:

IF it went down the way Zimmerman said it did, THEN he had the right to shoot.

Period.

[Rooivalk]

I don’t have to explain anything.

That's because you cannot.

Go read the stories of how the lead homicide investigator wanted to arrest and file on Zimmerman and the arrest warrant was "suppressed" somewhere along the way. Lets hear you comment on these developments.

Lets hear you talk about how Martin deserved to die in light of what the Sanford police thought after investigating the killing.

God is watching and truth always has a way of coming to light